The .44 Magnum Begins…
By Elmer Keith
Having wanted a .44 heavy load at the time I worked for Major Wesson in the ‘30s on the .357, I casted bullets for him to take down to Winchester, which was the start of the .357 Magnum. After I put 1000 rounds of 10 grains of No. 80 behind my 173-grain bullet through a heavy duty five-inch Smith & Wesson, I still wanted a heavier .44 Special load. I had been handloading 18 ½ grains of 2400 behind my 250-grain bullet for my .44 Special with excellent results, both on game, long range, target, anything I wanted to turn the gun on. I met a Mr. Peterson, who was then head ballistician at Remington. I put in all the available time with him that I could during the two weeks I was at Camp Perry, asking that he bring out my heavy load on the .44 Special. He and other Remington officials wanted me to come up to the Remington plant and spend a week with them after my assignment at Camp Perry. Also my friend, Carl Hellstrom, president of Smith & Wesson, wanted me to come up and spend a week at the Smith & Wesson plant with him. I asked General Edson’s permission after my two weeks assignment at Perry and he agreed for me to go on and tour the Remington and Smith & Wesson plants.
I
wanted two things from Remington. I wanted them to factory load my heavy .44
Special load, and I also wanted an ounce-and-a-quarter magnum 16-bore load that
I’d been loading successfully for years. There was no problem whatever on the
16-bore load. Peterson had called the boys all together, and they agreed on it
right away.
But
they were afraid of the old triple-lock Smith & Wesson with my heavy loads.
I told them I’d been shooting it for 10 to 15 years in the old gun I’d got
from McGivern with no problems whatever, fine accuracy, no undue pressure. But
they were skeptical of the old gun holding hold it. So I told them why not make
the case 1/10 inch longer and call it a .44 Magnum? They agreed that would be a
good idea but on the other hand, they said, where are you going to get the guns?
I told them I believed I could get Smith & Wesson to make the gun if they
would make the ammunition. After a week of going through all the production of
rifles, shotguns, and ammunition at
the Remington plants, I flew up to Springfield as a guest of Carl Hellstrom. I
put in a week there going through their wonderful plant.
He
had taken over Smith & Wesson when it was $13,000,000 in the red, and the
government wanted to put in the men there to oversee it. Carl Hellstrom said,
“I will have nothing to do with it if there is a single government man here.
If you’ll turn me loose, I’ll have Smith & Wesson out of the red in a
few years.” He showed me where he’d bulldozed a small hill into a swamp,
leveled it up, and built the Smith & Wesson plant, one of the finest arms
plants in the world today for its size. He could go underground if necessary, as
complete facilities were both underground and above ground.
There
I watched the building of Smith & Wesson handguns for a week, from the
forgings through the shapers, trimmers, then rifling machines and finally the
lapping of the barrels, then the Magnaflux checking of all parts before they
finally went on to assembly, down through assembly, proof-firing and final
inspection. It was a most enjoyable week for a man who had spent most of his
life experimenting with arms of all types.
I
also became acquainted with the heads of Smith & Wesson. The last day I was
there Carl Hellstrom called me in his office and we put in the whole morning
together. Several delegations came in from South America and Canada wanting to
see him, and he would have his secretary tell them he was in conference with
Keith and he would see them in the afternoon. I asked him to bring out a .44
Magnum and have Remington bring out the loads. He finally promised “I’ll
wrap a gun around any legitimate load that Remington will bring out.”
I
suggested he invite the heads of the Remington plant, the technical boys, up and
have them work with Bill Gunn, his foreman, and see if we couldn’t produce a
.44 Magnum and ammunition. This he agreed to do. He took me out to the old Smith
& Wesson residence which had been turned into a club. There we had dinner,
and a few drinks. Afterwards, he sent his car and his chauffeur to take me down
to the Colt plant and see that I got in touch with the Colt people. That was
September 19 and 53.
After
a lapse of several months the advertising manager, whose name I cannot now
recall, phoned me. He said, “Elmer, your dream has come true. The .44 Magnum
is now a fact. Carl had the Remington boys up here and they are making the
ammunition. The first .44 Magnum ever produced, the tool-room job, is on its way
to you now by air parcel post. Remington will send you a supply of ammunition
within a few weeks.” Which they did.
That
was the start of the .44 Magnum. As I remember, it arrived in February. Emmett
Steeples and I took it down to Wagonhammer Springs, and pulled off the road
there to sight it in. About 60 yards from the parked car there was a little
black stump of mahogany about four inches in diameter projecting out of the
snow. And just six or seven yards to the left of it was a big old buck mule
deer, bedded down. When he saw us, he pulled his down into the snow. His horns
were long gone, but his old white face and the way his ears flopped out to the
side, proved him to be an old buck. I believe I fired 16 shots at the little
stump, adjusting the sights with a screwdriver, and resting both arms out the
car window, until I hit the stump three times straight – or what was left of
it. Emmett says, “That old buck thinks we don’t see him.” We pulled out
and left him lying there in his bed with his head pulled down tight in the snow,
thinking we hadn’t seen him. He well knew if h jumped up that we would see
him. Out of season, we had no intention of bothering him whatever, but it was
interesting to watch how he pulled his head down and thought he was hid. We left
so he could stay hidden.
Next
Pete White from the slaughter house phoned me. He said, “Elmer, I have ten big
bulls out here I wish you would come out and shoot. You have some heavy sixguns
and we don’t have anything out here but a .22 and it is inadequate.”
I
drove out at seven in the morning, but I got there a bit early as the crew
hadn’t arrived. While I was standing there by a fence, a big goshawk flew into
the top of a cottonwood across a slough around 100 yards away. I rested both
arms on the top of a fence post, pulled down on the old goshawk and I killed
him. That was the first shot at game of any kind with a .44 Magnum to my
knowledge.
The
bulls were run into a chute by the side of the killing floor. There I put up a
ladder so I could shoot them in the forehead and had no trouble killing the
bulls with the big gun. They’d drop, and while the gun was still in recoil
their noses would hit the concrete. One they had me shoot from behind, the back
of the head. Both of his eyes popped out of their sockets when the big gun
cracked. Many people tried to claim credit for the .44 Magnum, but those were
the facts as I experienced them. I had been loading 18 ½ grains of 2400 behind
my 250-grain bullet a good many years in the .44 Special, and testing it on
game, target and long range.
Remington
ammunition came in plain boxes. I still have a little of it. With a part jacket
around over the base band and under the breach in the grease groove. The lead
was quite soft, it expanded well, and was very accurate. The velocity was around
1400 feet per second. Pressures ran around 34-35,000 psi. I shot the big gun a
good bit that spring and summer and worked out a load of 22 grains of 2400
behind my bullet as my favorite load. This developed 34,000 psi with less than
three thousand pounds variation. It was also wonderfully accurate. Velocity ran
around 1400 feet per second. That fall I went down to Kriley’s ranch on Clear
Creek, intending to shoot a buck with a sixgun.
One
day Judge Don Martin and I were shooting the gun over at the city dump. When we
started back, I spotted a rock down the canyon below the dump at what looked
like 500 yards from the road. We estimated the distance at that and I told Don
to park the car and turn off the motor and let me see what I could do with it.
The rock was about three feet long by about 18 inches high in the middle tapered
a little bit at each end. Resting my arms out the window, my right arm on the
back of the car seat as well, I tried it. The first shot was low. Holding up
more front sight and perching the rock on top of it, I managed to put the next
five on the rock. Don said, “Damn it, I seen it, but I still don’t believe
it. Let’s go down there.”
We
paced the distance down to the rock, both ways, and as near as we could figure,
it was five hundred yards. There was five splashes of lead on the rock and one
bullet that dug into the dirt short. This shooting, just before hunting season,
had given me a pretty good idea of
just how much front sight to hold up at long range.
Paul
Kriley and I hunted up Clear Creek on the right side where it is partly open
bunch grass meadows and partly patches of timber. We hunted all day, and
although we saw several does at 80-90 yards, one at 60, that I could have
killed. We passed them up, as I wanted a buck. Toward evening we topped out on a
ridge. There was swale between us and another small ridge on the side of the
mountain slope about 300-400 yards away. Beyond that, out on the open sidehill,
no doubt on account of the cougar, were about 20 mule deer feeding. Two big
bucks were in the band, and some lesser ones, the rest were does and long fawns.
As it was getting late and the last day of the season, I wanted one of those
bucks for meat. Being a half-mile away, I told Paul, “Take the .300 Magnum and
duck back out of sight here, go around through this swale to that next ridge and
that should put you within about 500 yards of them. I’ll stay here (the deer
had seen us), let them watch me for a decoy.” Paul said, “You take the
rifle.”
I
said, ‘How is it sighted?”
He
said, “One inch high at a hundred yards.” I told him to go ahead because I
wouldn’t know where to hold it. I always sighted a .300 Magnum 3 inches high
at a hundred and I wouldn’t know where to hold it at 500.
I
said, “You go ahead and kill the biggest buck in the bunch for me.” Paul
took off, went across the swale and climbed the ridge, laid down and crawled up
to the top. He shot. The lower of two bucks, which he later said the biggest
one, dropped and rolled down the mountain. I then took off across the swale to
join him. Just before I climbed up the ridge to where he lying, he started
shooting again.
When
I came up on top, the band of deer was pretty well long gone. They’d gone out
to the next ridge top, turned up it slightly and went over. But the old buck was
up following their trail, one front leg a-swinging. Paul had hit it. I asked
Paul, “Is there any harm in me getting into this show?” He said, “No, go
ahead.”
I
had to lay down prone, because if I crawled over the hill to assume my old
backside position, then the blast of his gun would be right in my ear. Shooting
prone with a .44 Magnum is something I don’t like at all. The concussion is
terrific. It will just about bust your ear drums every time. At any rate Paul
shot and missed. I held all of the front sight up, or practically all of it, and
perched the running deer on top of the front sight and squeezed on off. Paul
said, “I saw it through my scope. It hit in the mud and snow right below
him.” There was possibly six inches of wet snow, with muddy ground underneath.
I told him, “I won’t be low the next shot.” Paul shot again and missed
with his .300 Magnum. The next time I held all of the front sight up and a bit
of the ramp, just perched the deer on top. After the shot the gun came down out
of recoil and the bullet had evidently landed. The buck made a high buck-jump,
swapped ends, and came back toward us, shaking his head. I told Paul I must have
hat a horn. I asked him to let the buck come back until he was right on us if he
would, let him come as close as he would and I’d jump up and kill him. When he
came back to where Paul had first rolled him, out about 500 yards, Paul said,
“I could hit him now, I think.”
“Well,”
I said, “I don’t like to see a deer run on three legs. Go ahead.” He shot
again and missed. The buck swapped ends and turned around and went back right
over the same trail. Paul said, “I’m out of ammunition. Empty.” I told him
to reload, duck back out of sight, go on around the hill and head the old buck
off, and I’d chase him on around. Paul took off on a run to go around this
bunch-grass hill and get up above the buck and on top. He was young, husky, and
could run like a deer himself. I got on the buck again with all of the front
sight and a trifle of the ramp up. Just as I was going to squeeze it off when he
got to the ridge, he turned up it just as the band of deer had done. So I moved
the sight picture in front of him and shot. After and interval he went down and
out of sight. I didn’t think anything of it, thought he had just tipped over
the ridge. It took me about half an hour to get across.
When
I got over there to the ridge, I saw where he’d rolled down the hill about
fifty yards, bleeding badly, and then he’d gotten up and walked from the
tracks to the ridge in front of us. There were a few pine trees down below, so I
cut across to intercept his tracks. I could see was bleeding both sides.
Just
before I got to the top of the ridge I heard a shot up above me and then another
shot, and I yelled asked if it was Paul. He answered. I asked, “Did you get
him?” He said, “Yes, he’s down there by that big pine tree below you.
Climb a little higher and you can see him.” Paul came down and we went down to
the buck. Paul said the buck was walking along all humped up very slowly. He
held back of the shoulders as he was quartering away. The first shot went
between his forelegs and threw up snow. Then he said the buck turned a little
more away from him and held higher and dropped. Finally we parted the hair in
the right flank and found where the 180-grain needle-pointed Remington spitzer
had gone in. later I determined it blew up and lodged in the left shoulder. At
any rate I looked his horns over, trying to see where I’d hit a horn. No sign
of it. Finally I found a bullet hole back of the right jaw and it came out the
top of his nose. That was the shot I’d hit him with out at 600 yards. Then
Paul said, “Who shot him through lungs broadside? I didn’t, never had that
kind of shot at all.”
There
was an entrance hole fairly high on the right side of the rib cage just under
the spine and an exit just about three or four inches lower on the other side.
The deer had been approximately the same elevation as I was when I fried that
last shot at him. We dressed him, drug him down the trail on Clear Creek, hung
him up, and went on down to the ranch. The next day a man named Posy and I came
back with a pack horse, loaded him and took him in. I took a few pictures of him
hanging in the woodshed along with the Smith & Wesson .44 Mag.
I
took him home and hung him up in the garage. About ten days later my son Ted
came home from college and I told him, “Ted, go out and skin that big buck and
get us some chops. They should be well-ripened and about right for dinner
tonight.” After awhile Ted came in and he laid the part jacket of a Remington
bullet on the table beside me and said, “Dad, I found this right beside the
exit hole on the left side of that buck’s ribs.” Then I knew that I had hit
him at that long range two out of four times. I believe I missed the first shot,
we didn’t see it at all, and it was on the second that Paul said he saw snow
and mud fly up at his heels. I wrote up and I’ve been called a liar ever
since, but Paul Kriley is still alive and able to vouch for the facts.
This
first Smith & Wesson .44 Magnum has a 6 ½-inch barrel.
By
the time Ted was eleven, he’d accompanied me on several hunts. Often times
I’d let him take the saddle horse and the pack string on the trail while I
hunted off to one side. He soon became very proficient with horses, and also a
good shot for a kid. He hilled his first bear and deer when he was eleven and
twelve years old with a .45-70 Model 86 lightweight Winchester , one shot for
each animal.
After
termination of my services of eight years with The American Rifleman, I
also took on the job as gun editor of the little Western Sportsman in
Denver for the four years that it lasted before it folded up. They, like the Outdoorsman
magazine, left me holding the sack for my last two months’ wages.
Having
guided for and killed most game in North America, I had long dreamed of hunting
Africa. At 50 years of age, I decided to quit guiding. I’d served my time.
I’d killed eight rams myself, and guided for 25 more – to say nothing of
many elk, deer, and bear hunts. I decided to put in my time writing, so I rented
out the ranch and bought a good home in Salmon a few months after Druzilla’s
death. We moved to Salmon during some of the worst weather we have ever had here
– the winter of 19 and 48. U.S. Highway 93 was being built and was simply a
mud puddle all the way. I rented a truck and finally succeeded in moving
everything to town and we had a good home there. During the winter of
’48 we had two months of hard weather, but nothing to compare with what
I’d seen in Montana in the winter of 19 and 19, and 19 and 20. We did have two
months of 20 to 43 below. Lorraine, Ted and I enjoyed a good modern home in
comparison to the ranch down on the North Fork.
General
Hatcher is one the finest men I’ve ever known. He and his wife visited us for
a couple of days here in Salmon on one of his trips to the West. My associations
with the NRA were very good until a new editor took over in the latter part of
the eight years I spent on that assignment. This man rewrote and changed some of
my articles; changed a bull elk into a caribou from one paragraph to another;
changed a 450-pound goat that I wrote up on that episode on the Cottonwood to
150-pounder. I had to buy a lot of whiskey for old timers here in Salmon who’d
come along, put their arm around me and say, “Elmer, why didn’t you kick
that little kid off the ledge?”
At
that time was drawing $400 from The American Rifleman monthly. Bev Mann,
who had been a former editor of The Rifleman, asked me if I wouldn’t do
a column for him each month and take on the arms assignment for Guns magazine
in Chicago. I had signed a contract with the NRA in July. It allowed me to write
for any and all magazines I desired, so long as I answered the 300 to 500
letters The Rifleman sent me each month and furnished what articles they
wanted for the magazine. This agreement I had kept to the letter. However they
didn’t keep the contract with me. My nave was taken off the staff, off the
masthead, and I was changed to a contributing editor in fine print at the very
bottom of the page. Many people jumped me at various conventions wanting to know
why I was writing the way I had. I told them that it was not my doings. The
editor had changed my text. Then they went after him. He in turn jumped on me
and I told him he would have to accept the blame for any changes he made in my
material. Things went from bad to worse between us, and after eight years on the
technical staff of The Rifleman, as contributing editor, I had accepted
an assignment to write a column on guns each month for Guns magazine in
Chicago for $150 a month. I received a call one morning from the editor wanting
to know if I was quitting The Rifleman and going to write for Guns.
I told him I had no intention of quitting The Rifleman and I told General
Hatcher I wanted to make it my life work. However he said he and Mr. Lucas would
take a very dim view of me writing for two magazines at once. I told him he’d
better read the contract which allowed me to write for any and all magazines as
long as I filled my assignment with The Rifleman. He said, “You write
me a letter to that effect that I can show to Mr. Lucas.”
I
said, “You have ears. I’m not going to write any letter.”
Some
two weeks later he again phoned at seven in the morning and wanted to know if
I’d sent that letter. I told him, “What letter?” He said, “The one
telling me you are going to write for Guns.”
I
said, “I told you at that time that I wasn’t going to write you a letter,
and I haven’t.”
“Well,”
he said, “Mr. Lucas and I would take a very dim view of you writing for two
magazines at once.”
I
said, “Mister, and you can tell Mr. Lucas, you can take any damn view you
desire.” In 15 minutes I was terminated from my assignment with The
American Rifleman magazine. Lorraine asked me, “What are you going to do
now, Dad, on $150 a month from Guns magazine?”
I said, “I’m going to Africa.”